6 Month Report Assessment
Last Modified on 06/07/2022 6:07 pm NZST
Overview of the report assessment process
- Client submits their 6 Month report
- Assessment
- Peer review / moderation
- Approval of assessment
- Communication of results
Assessment criteria for six-monthly reporting
6-month reports are assessed using four criteria:
Quality
We will assess whether:
The activity was delivered as per the agreed programme and budget submitted in November. Variations are acceptable only if approved in advance by CNZ staff or as a result of Covid-19 impacts. Please provide commentary if this has been the case. Activities were evaluated and met or exceeded your quality measures. Activity statistics (e.g. the number of new works, events, participation and audience figures) were within 10% of projections or higher.
|
Alignment to Creative New Zealand's strategies
We will assess:
For all organisations: How your organisation is delivering to its contractual requirements (e.g., Outcome Features, Development Goals if applcable). How your organisations delivered to Creative New Zealand's commitment to diversity as expressed in our Diversity in the Arts Policy.
For non-Māori organisations: How your organisation supported the role of Māori as tangata whenua. For organisations who chose to be assessed as Māori arts: How your organisation delivered to principles of Mātauranga Māori and to Te Hā o Ngā Toi where applicable. For organisations who chose to be assessed as Pacific arts: How your organisation delivered to principles of Kaupapa Pasifika and to The Pacific Arts Strategy where applicable. For organisations in the Tōtara programme: How strongly your organisation contributed to arts sector capability and development.
|
Financial health
We will assess whether: - Your organisation’s projections are comparable and realistic, and its financial position and financial performance is not declining.
- Your organisation is solvent and a going concern (e.g. you are able to pay your debts as they become due in the normal course of business, and you can expect to continue trading)
- Your organisation can pay its bills and people in the short term (working capital viability).
- Your organisation has a healthy net equity surplus (total assets less total liabilities) and its financial performance is not significantly impairing the net equity position.
- Has demonstrated sound financial management and planning.
TEOs and their subsidiaries, council-controlled organisations, and organisations receiving less than $75,000 per annum are exempt from this requirement.
|
Organisational health
We will assess whether: The overall structure of your organisation is "fit for purpose" and enables delivery of programme/services and achievement of its purpose and objectives. Your staff have the skills and experience to deliver their roles well. Your organisation is making progress against its business and strategic plans. Your organisation is well-governed (if it is a trust). We will look at whether the submitted board minutes: demonstrate clear accountabilities, include analysis of financial reporting, demonstrate ongoing risk management.
TEOs and their subsidiaries, council-controlled organisations, and organisations receiving less than $75,000 per annum are exempt from this requirement.
|
Summary Performance Rating
Each of the four criteria is assessed and awarded a score out of seven.
Your organisation will receive a Summary Performance Rating (Did Not Meet, Met, Exceed) based on the total score out of 28:
Total Score | Summary Performance Rating |
---|
0 - 12 | Did Not Meet Expectations |
13 - 20 | Met Expectations |
21 - 28 | Exceed Expectations |
Assessment Scale
7 | Excellent - Exceeds all indicators |
---|
6 | Very good - Satisfies all indicators and exceeds in more than one |
---|
5 | Good - Satisfies all indicators and exceeds in one |
---|
4 | Met expectations - Satisfies all indicators |
---|
3 | Minor reservations - Satisfies most indicators however there are minor reservations |
---|
2 | Major reservations - Satisfies some indicators however there are major reservations |
---|
1 | Unacceptable - Does not meet the indicators |
---|
0 | There is no evidence provided |
---|